This is self-defense against the aggression of religion against reason and human logic.
Errico Malatesta Italian anarchist thinker modern, he says that closes a period of anarchist classics (along with Proudhon, Bakunin and Kropotkin .)
How many times we repeat that we do not want to impose anything anybody, we do not believe neither possible nor desirable to want the good of the people by force and that all we want is that no one imposed on us his will, that no one can impose on others their way of social life not freely accepted?
Anarchism can not be imposed, either on moral grounds of respect for freedom, either through lack of force applied to a system of justice for all. Can not be imposed on the majority by a minority, but also by the majority to one or more minorities.
why we are anarchists, that is, we give everyone the effective freedom to live as they wish, which is not possible without expropriating the now stop the social wealth without placing the means of work available to everyone.
The basis of anarchist method is freedom, and therefore, we struggle and fight against anything that violates freedom (freedom equal for all), whatever the ruling regime: monarchy, republic or others. We, however, do not claim to possess absolute truth, we believe more in the social truth, the best form of social interaction is not fixed, valid for all times and all places, which can be determined in advance, but something that, once secured the release, she is gradually being discovered and implemented with lower friction and lower potential violence. So our solutions always leave the door to several solutions and, hopefully, better.
Our goal is the good of all, elimination of all suffering and the spread of all the joys that may depend on human will, is peace and love among all human beings is a new and better civilization, a more dignified and happy humanity. But we believe that the good of all can not be actually achieved rather than the conscious collaboration of all, we believe that there are no magic formulas capable of resolving the difficulties, there is no universal and infallible doctrine applicable to all men and all cases, that No matches men and angels that can usefully replace the will of others for their own and do good to the force, we believe that social life takes forms that are always against the interests of the ideals of those who think and want. So we call on all to think and want. Anarchist
is, by definition, one who does not want to be depressed and will not be oppressor the one who wants maximum comfort, maximum freedom, the maximum development of all human beings. His ideas, his willingness to have their origin in the sense of sympathy, love, respect for all humans: a feeling that must be strong enough to induce him to desire the good of others as their own and give to those that require personal advantages to be obtained, the sacrifice of others. O
be oppressed, or be oppressive, or voluntarily cooperate for the greater good of all. There is no other alternative, and anarchists are naturally, and can not not be, in favor of deliberate cooperation and free.
us not come with philosophies and talk about selfishness, altruism, or other puzzles. We agree: we are all selfish, we all seek our satisfaction. But an anarchist one whose greatest satisfaction is to fight for the good of all, for the realization of a society in which he may encounter, brother among brothers, among healthy men, intelligent, educated and happy.
who, in turn, can be adjusted, happy, to live among slaves and take advantage of slave labor is not, can not be anarchist.
How many times we repeat that we do not want to impose anything anybody, we do not believe neither possible nor desirable to want the good of the people by force and that all we want is that no one imposed on us his will, that no one can impose on others their way of social life not freely accepted?
Anarchism can not be imposed, either on moral grounds of respect for freedom, either through lack of force applied to a system of justice for all. Can not be imposed on the majority by a minority, but also by the majority to one or more minorities.
why we are anarchists, that is, we give everyone the effective freedom to live as they wish, which is not possible without expropriating the now stop the social wealth without placing the means of work available to everyone.
The basis of anarchist method is freedom, and therefore, we struggle and fight against anything that violates freedom (freedom equal for all), whatever the ruling regime: monarchy, republic or others. We, however, do not claim to possess absolute truth, we believe more in the social truth, the best form of social interaction is not fixed, valid for all times and all places, which can be determined in advance, but something that, once secured the release, she is gradually being discovered and implemented with lower friction and lower potential violence. So our solutions always leave the door to several solutions and, hopefully, better.
Our goal is the good of all, elimination of all suffering and the spread of all the joys that may depend on human will, is peace and love among all human beings is a new and better civilization, a more dignified and happy humanity. But we believe that the good of all can not be actually achieved rather than the conscious collaboration of all, we believe that there are no magic formulas capable of resolving the difficulties, there is no universal and infallible doctrine applicable to all men and all cases, that No matches men and angels that can usefully replace the will of others for their own and do good to the force, we believe that social life takes forms that are always against the interests of the ideals of those who think and want. So we call on all to think and want. Anarchist
is, by definition, one who does not want to be depressed and will not be oppressor the one who wants maximum comfort, maximum freedom, the maximum development of all human beings. His ideas, his willingness to have their origin in the sense of sympathy, love, respect for all humans: a feeling that must be strong enough to induce him to desire the good of others as their own and give to those that require personal advantages to be obtained, the sacrifice of others. O
be oppressed, or be oppressive, or voluntarily cooperate for the greater good of all. There is no other alternative, and anarchists are naturally, and can not not be, in favor of deliberate cooperation and free.
us not come with philosophies and talk about selfishness, altruism, or other puzzles. We agree: we are all selfish, we all seek our satisfaction. But an anarchist one whose greatest satisfaction is to fight for the good of all, for the realization of a society in which he may encounter, brother among brothers, among healthy men, intelligent, educated and happy.
who, in turn, can be adjusted, happy, to live among slaves and take advantage of slave labor is not, can not be anarchist.
